ext_26904 ([identity profile] propernice.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] csi2007-03-29 08:12 pm

(no subject)

This is the discussion post for tonight's episode "Empty Eyes".

Please know that there will be spoilers within this post. Refrain from posting spoilers regarding upcoming episodes. No posts concerning tonight's episode will be approved to the community until three days after the original air date. Icon posts with teasers related to tonight's episode will be rejected.

Happy watching :)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
The person who's watching is the one who knows if x and y have chemistry or not.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
No, the person who is watching is the one whose opinion matters. It's the audience that knows if A and B have chemistry or not, and not the actors. We see it, not them.

They said it, so what? Doesn't make it true. I'm watching it, not them.

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Besides, of course the actors are gonna say that. What else are they supposed to say?
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
You speak as if chemistry is made up. Chemistry is in the eye of the beholder. Again, because WP say so and so have chemistry doesn't make it true. He cannot know who have chemistry better with who because it's all based on opinions. And again, OF COURSE he's gonna say he has chemistry with Jorja, hello.

He says he and Jorja have chemistry, 50% agrees, 50%doesn't, end of story. It's everyone's opinions.