ext_26904 ([identity profile] propernice.livejournal.com) wrote in [community profile] csi2007-03-29 08:12 pm

(no subject)

This is the discussion post for tonight's episode "Empty Eyes".

Please know that there will be spoilers within this post. Refrain from posting spoilers regarding upcoming episodes. No posts concerning tonight's episode will be approved to the community until three days after the original air date. Icon posts with teasers related to tonight's episode will be rejected.

Happy watching :)

[identity profile] starbucks5721.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 05:31 pm (UTC)(link)
why not? I only meant that the chemistry between the two didnt flow like it usually does...

[identity profile] galbadia.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 05:33 pm (UTC)(link)
They don't really have any chemistry, though.

[identity profile] starbucks5721.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
ohhh, gotcha. I'd have to disagree with you, though :)

[identity profile] galbadia.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 05:37 pm (UTC)(link)
And I disagree with you, so we're even.

[identity profile] starbucks5721.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 05:38 pm (UTC)(link)
excellent! glad we got that settled.

*throws a partay*
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] galbadia.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm gonna stick with they don't have any. 'Cause it's kinda, oh, I dunno ... true? Yes. True.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
The person who's watching is the one who knows if x and y have chemistry or not.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 12:04 am (UTC)(link)
No, the person who is watching is the one whose opinion matters. It's the audience that knows if A and B have chemistry or not, and not the actors. We see it, not them.

They said it, so what? Doesn't make it true. I'm watching it, not them.

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Besides, of course the actors are gonna say that. What else are they supposed to say?
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
You speak as if chemistry is made up. Chemistry is in the eye of the beholder. Again, because WP say so and so have chemistry doesn't make it true. He cannot know who have chemistry better with who because it's all based on opinions. And again, OF COURSE he's gonna say he has chemistry with Jorja, hello.

He says he and Jorja have chemistry, 50% agrees, 50%doesn't, end of story. It's everyone's opinions.

[identity profile] allstar12.livejournal.com 2007-03-30 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Chemistry is in the eye of the beholder. You think they have it. She thinks they don't, who cares..? There have been so many occassions where Ive seen characters with tons of chemistry and yet, other people don't see it.

So, you can't very well say, "oh, those two have chemistry cause the actors think so" because that's their (the actors) opinion, it's not going to make everyone else magically believe them.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] ex-monarchy375.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 05:16 am (UTC)(link)
Just takin' a guess here.

You love wank, maybe?

Oh, and. Maybe you going "OMG TEHY SEW HAEV TEH CHEMESTRIZ!!!!" is just as bad as her saying they don't. You've got as much of a right to think they do as she does to think they don't.

[identity profile] syoban.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 11:59 am (UTC)(link)
Except [livejournal.com profile] divergent's original post was a pretty obviously a flame against those of us who do think they have chemistry.

We think they do, you guys think they don't. Do you really expect us not to defend ourselves? But I guess only our side can be ~wanky~

[identity profile] wickedandcruel.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 02:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Hadria wasn't defending herself, she was: BILLY AND JORJA SAY THEY HAVE CHEMISTRY SO IT MAKES IT TRUE NOW STFU.

Er, no? Actors saying doesn't mean anything.

[identity profile] ex-monarchy375.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 04:44 pm (UTC)(link)
But responding to it just started wank.

It's like if someone made a comment like "Ew, Nick/Sara is grossorz." I'd just let it go, personally--because obviously that's how that person feels, and it's not really worth calling shenanigans on it.

IT'S A SHOW. People disagree. People bitch, people love, etc. But doing something like what happened just ends with a whole bunch of nasty comments back and forth, and I don't really see why it's worth it. She doesn't like it, fine. Other people do, fine. That's why I don't get why it was necessary for [livejournal.com profile] hadria to pop in all "DO TOO DDDDD:" because that's obviously NOT going to change Elena's mind.

[identity profile] ex-monarchy375.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 04:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Also, I don't think it was a "flame against those of us who do think they have chemistry", it was a flame on a relationship. ON TV.

[identity profile] syoban.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 05:42 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right, it's a show. I just think it's really hypocritical to say Hadria started wank when the first comment WAS wanky (too?). Whether you want to believe it or not.

Either way, I honestly don't care whether anyone thinks they have chemistry or not, because I personally think they do.

[identity profile] ex-monarchy375.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 06:12 pm (UTC)(link)
I just thought she fed the wank, and it'd be better not to really go and pick a fight over something over opinions. It's like when someone'd make a political post, and someone else would be all, "AW HELL NO THIS IS HOW IT GOES". Instead of just doing the mature thing and agreeing that she disagrees, I don't get the whole "COMMENT AND COMPLAIN" deal. XD;

And that's totally fine. I think the actors have chemistry, too--even though I saw more of it sticking as UST with the characters. XD; Grissom's speech at the end of Butterflied completely blew my mind. I think George and Jorja have chemistry too, etc--and that's that. 8D;

(Anonymous) 2007-03-31 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
haha, yer pretty great. :]
gsr fo life. lol.

[identity profile] deadlypoise.livejournal.com 2007-03-31 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
that was me. aha.